Search for: "Sharkninja Operating LLC" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2016, 1:02 pm by Associated Press
Dyson, the British technology company known for its upscale vacuums, and SharkNinja Operating LLC, a Massachusetts-based company known for its infomercials and lower-priced vacuums, had sued each other over advertising campaigns ... [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corporation and Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:05 am by Michael S. Levine and Casey L. Coffey
SharkNinja Operating LLC, et al., that insurer Indian Harbor must defend SharkNinja against underlying patent infringement and false advertising claims despite a patent infringement exclusion. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:04 pm by Scott McKeown
Given the highly factual nature of this case, the precedential value of this case lies in the application of 314(a) to such filings as “follow-on” petitions, and that the factors outlined by the CAFC in its remand decision may be applied to similar circumstances where member organizations are involved (assuming a time bar exists to trigger the assessment in accordance with SharkNinja, below) SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corp., IPR2020-00734,… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:07 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Emma Lewis
., NAD recommended that SharkNinja Operating LLC discontinue certain advertising claims that compared the company’s Shark Rocket DeluxePro Vacuum to upright vacuums and in particular, to the Dyson V6 vacuum. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:39 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Bennett Sooy
SharkNinja Vacuum May Suck Hardest, Doesn’t Mean It Cleans Better SharkNinja LLC has agreed to modify advertising claims in response to the NAD’s recommendation that the company’s advertisement of best “overall” floor cleaning should be based on an industry standard measure, and not select criteria. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:08 am by Dennis Crouch
SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corp. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus and Carter C. Simpson
SharkNinja Declares “Fin” on Certain Advertising Practices SharkNinja Operating LLC has agreed to comply with the NAD’s recommendation that the company modify certain claims made in infomercials and on its website and product packaging concerning its IONFlex vacuum cleaner. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus
SharkNinja Declares “Fin” on Certain Advertising Practices SharkNinja Operating LLC has agreed to comply with the NAD’s recommendation that the company modify certain claims made in infomercials and on its website and product packaging concerning its IONFlex vacuum cleaner. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 10:06 pm by Scott McKeown
SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corp., (here) SharkNinja instituted trial in the face of an RPI dispute, explaining that, while petitioners must identify any real parties-in-interest, and must do so in good faith, the Board does not need to resolve a dispute regarding a possible real party-in-interest if it would not impact the Board’s institution decision (i.e., there is no 315(b) time bar involving the disputed, unnamed party). [read post]